Logo   Reprints - Duane Watson

To request a reprint, please click on the highlighted text in the list below. If the text is grayed out, that article is not yet available in PDF format.

Lee, E.- K.(2009, March). Do listeners keep track of global prosodic information?: Evidence from an eye-tracking study. Poster presentation at CUNY 2009: Conference on Human Sentence Processing Conference, Davis, CA.

In Press

Lewis, M.L. & Watson, D.G. (2015) Effects of lexical semantics on acoustic prominence. Language and Cognition, 7, 1-21.
Arnold, J.E. & Watson, D.G. (in press). Synthesizing meaning and processing approaches to prosody: Performance matters. Language and Cognitive Processes.
Breen, M., Watson, D.G., & Gibson, E. (in press). Intonational phrasing is constrained by meaning, not balance. Language and Cognitive Processes.
Fraundorf, S. H., & Watson, D. G. (in press). Alice's adventures in um-derland: Psycholinguistic dimensions of variation in disfluency production. Language and Cognitive Processes. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.832785
Gillespie, M., James, A.N., Federmeier, K.D., & Watson, D.G. (in press). Verbal Working memory predicts co-speech gesture: Evidence from individual differences. Cognition.
Watson, D. G., Buxó-Lugo, A., & Simmons, D. C. (in press). The effect of phonological encoding on word duration: Selection takes time. In E. Gibson & L. Frazier (Eds.), Explicit and Implicit Prosody in Sentence Processing.
Watson, D.G. (in press) Prosody in Production. In H. Pashler (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Mind. Sage Publications.
Yiu, L. & Watson, D.G. (in press). When overlap leads to competition: Effects of phonological encoding on word duration. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.


Fraundorf, S.H., Watson, D.G., & Benjamin, A.S. (2015). Reduction in prosodic prominence predicts speakers' recall: Implications for theories of prosody. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 30, 606-619.


Lam, T.Q. & Watson, D.G. (2014). Repetition Reduction: Lexical repetition in the absence of referent reptition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. (pre-published)
Tooley, K.M., Konopka, A.E., & Watson, D.G. (2014). Can intonational phrase structure be primed (like syntactic structure). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 40, 348-363.


Fraundorf, S. H., Benjamin, A.S., & Watson, D.G. (2013). What happened (and what didn’t): Font emphasis promotes representation of salient alternatives in discourse. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 196-227.
Lee, E-K., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Watson, D.G. (2013). Ways of looking ahead: Incrementality in language production. Cognition, 129, 544-562.


Fraundorf, S. H., Watson, D. G., & Benjamin. A. S. (2012). The effects of age on the strategic use of pitch accents in memory for discourse: A processing-resource account. Psychology and Aging, 27, 88-98.
Lee, E.-K., & Watson, D. G. (in press). Sentence processing. In V. S. Ramachandran (Editor-In-Chief), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (2nd Edition). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.


Fraundorf, S. H. & Watson, D.G. (2011). The disfluent discourse: Effects of filled pauses on recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 161-175.
Lee, E.-K. & Watson, D. G. (2011). Effects of pitch accents in attachment ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26:2, 262-297.


Fraundorf, S. H., Watson, D. G., & Benjamin, A. S. (2010). Recognition memory reveals just how CONTRASTIVE contrastive accenting really is. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 367-386.
Isaacs, A. M. & Watson, D. G. (2010). Accent detection is a slippery slope: Direction and rate of F0 change drives comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes. 25:7, 1178-1200.
Lam, T.Q. & Watson, D.G. (2010). Repetition is easy: Why repeated referents have reduced prominence. Memory & Cognition, 38:8, 1137-1146.
Wagner, M. & Watson, D.G. (2010) Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25:7, 905-945.
Watson, D.G. (2010) The many roads to prominence: Understanding emphasis in conversation. In B. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 52 (163-183). Elsevier.


Diehl, J.J., Watson, D.G., Bennetto, L., McDonough, J., Young, E.C., Gunlgoson, C. (2009). An acoustic analysis of prosody in high functioning autism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 1-20.


Diehl, J. J., Bennetto, L., Watson, D. G., Gunlogson, C., McDonough, J. (2008). Resolving ambiguity: A psycholinguistic approach to understanding prosody processing in high functioning autism. Brain and Language, 106,144-152.
Watson, D. G., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Gunlogson, C. A. (2008). Interpreting Pitch Accents in Online Comprehension: H* vs. L+H*. Cognitive Science, 32, 1232-1244.
Watson, D., Arnold, J. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Tic Tac TOE: Effects of predictability and importance on acoustic prominence in language production. Cognition, 106, 1548-1557.
Wonnacott, E. & Watson, D., (2008). Acoustic emphasis in four year olds. Cognition, 107, 1093-1101.


Watson, D. G., Gunlogson, C. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2006). Online methods for the investigation of prosody. In S. Sudhoff, D. Lenertov, R. Meyer, S. Pappert, P. Augurzky, I. Mleinek, N. Richter, J. Schlieer (eds.), Methods in Empirical Prosody Research. Walter de Gruyter: New York. 259-282
Watson, D., Breen, M., & Gibson, E. A. (2006). The role of syntactic obligatoriness in the production of intonational boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32, 1045-1056.


Watson, D. & Gibson, E. (2005). Intonational phrasing and constituency in language production and comprehension. Studia Linguistica, 59, 279-300.


Watson, D. & Gibson, E. (2004). Making sense of the sense unit condition, Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 508-517.
Watson, D. & Gibson, E. (2004). The relationship between intonational phrasing and syntactic structure in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 713-755.

Last Updated: March 25, 2015
Site Index